Stablecoins Explained: Complete Guide
USDC, USDT, DAI-how do they maintain their peg? Understand the backbone of DeFi.
🎯 What You'll Learn
- Understand what stablecoins are
- Learn the different types and their trade-offs
- Know the risks of each type
- See how stablecoins enable DeFi
- Analyze stablecoin stability mechanisms
The Foundation of DeFi
You can’t do finance with assets that swing 10% daily. That’s why stablecoins exist-cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, usually pegged to $1 USD.
Stablecoins are the bridge between volatile crypto and usable money.
Why Stablecoins Matter
| Problem | Stablecoin Solution |
|---|---|
| Crypto volatility | Stable value for pricing |
| Fiat on-ramps | Hold USD on-chain |
| DeFi operations | Lending, borrowing, trading |
| Cross-border payments | Fast, cheap transfers |
Types of Stablecoins
1. Fiat-Backed
Each stablecoin is backed by $1 in a bank:
| Stablecoin | Issuer | Backing |
|---|---|---|
| USDC | Circle | USD in banks (audited) |
| USDT | Tether | USD + other assets |
| BUSD | Binance/Paxos | USD (regulated) |
User deposits $100 → Issuer mints 100 USDC
User redeems 100 USDC → Issuer burns, returns $100
```text
**Pros**: Simple, intuitive backing
**Cons**: Centralized, can be frozen, regulatory risk
### 2. Crypto-Backed
Overcollateralized by crypto assets:
```text
Deposit 1.5 ETH ($3,000)
→ Borrow up to 2,000 DAI ($2,000)
→ 150% collateralization ratio
```bash
| Stablecoin | Protocol | Collateral |
|------------|----------|------------|
| **DAI** | MakerDAO | ETH, WBTC, stablecoins |
| **LUSD** | Liquity | ETH only |
| **sUSD** | Synthetix | SNX |
**Pros**: Decentralized, transparent, no freeze risk
**Cons**: Capital inefficient, liquidation risk
### 3. Algorithmic
Supply adjusts automatically to maintain peg:
```text
Price > $1 → Mint more (increase supply, lower price)
Price < $1 → Burn/incentivize removes (decrease supply, raise price)
| Stablecoin | Mechanism | Status |
|---|---|---|
| FRAX | Fractional-algorithmic | Hybrid |
| UST | Algorithmic | Collapsed |
Pros: Capital efficient, scalable Cons: Death spiral risk (UST proved this)
How DAI Maintains Its Peg
Mint more DAI (arbitrage) → Peg: $1.00 ← DAI < $1
Buy DAI, repay loans
- **DAI > 1+ profit
- DAI < $1: Users buy cheap DAI, repay debt at discount
- Liquidation: Undercollateralized positions are liquidated
The Risks
De-peg Risk
Stablecoins can lose their peg:
| Event | Stablecoin | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 USDC de-peg | USDC | Briefly $0.88 (SVB exposure) |
| 2022 UST collapse | UST | 0.02 |
| 2022 Tether FUD | USDT | Briefly $0.95 |
Regulatory Risk
Fiat-backed stablecoins can be:
- Frozen (blacklisted addresses)
- Regulated out of existence
- Required to hold only government bonds
Smart Contract Risk
Crypto-backed stablecoins rely on code:
- Bugs can cause loss
- Oracle failures affect liquidations
- Governance attacks
Analyzing Stablecoin Safety
| Question | Safe Answer |
|---|---|
| What’s the backing? | Clear, audited reserves |
| Can it be frozen? | For fiat-backed, yes |
| Regulatory status? | Compliant, licensed |
| Audit history? | Regular, public attestations |
| Peg stability? | <1% deviation historically |
Practice Exercises
Exercise 1: Compare Stablecoins (Beginner)
Look up on CoinGecko:
- Market cap of USDC, USDT, DAI
- Which is largest?
- Has any de-pegged recently?
Exercise 2: DAI Vault Math (Intermediate)
You deposit 2 ETH at 4,000 collateral). Liquidation threshold: 150%
- Maximum DAI you can mint?
- At what ETH price are you liquidated?
Answer
- $4,000 / 1.5 = 2,666 DAI max
- If you mint 2,666 DAI: Liquidation when collateral = 2,666 × 1.5 = 4,000 / 2 = **1,500 ETH
Exercise 3: Research (Advanced)
Research how FRAX’s fractional-algorithmic mechanism differs from UST’s approach. Why did one survive and one collapse?
Knowledge Check
-
What’s the difference between fiat-backed and crypto-backed stablecoins?
-
Why do crypto-backed stablecoins need overcollateralization?
-
What went wrong with UST?
-
Can USDC be frozen?
-
How does DAI maintain its peg?
Answers
-
Fiat-backed = USD in banks. Crypto-backed = crypto locked in smart contracts.
-
Volatility. If collateral drops in value, overcollateralization provides buffer before liquidation.
-
Death spiral. When UST de-pegged, LUNA minting caused hyperinflation, destroying both assets.
-
Yes. Circle can blacklist addresses, making their USDC unusable.
-
Arbitrage. When DAI > 1, users buy to repay debt cheaply.
Summary
| Type | Backing | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiat-backed | USD in banks | Simple, stable | Centralized, freezable |
| Crypto-backed | Over-collateralized | Decentralized | Capital inefficient |
| Algorithmic | Supply adjustment | Capital efficient | Death spiral risk |
What’s Next?
- Crypto Wallet Types - Securing your stablecoins
- Yield Farming Basics - Earning with stablecoins
Want to go deeper?
Weekly infrastructure insights for engineers who build trading systems.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in. Check your inbox.
Questions about this lesson? Working on related infrastructure?
Let's discuss